Image 01

doug woods

ICT in Education Consultant and Trainer

Archive for March, 2010

Change Management in Schools

Monday, March 29th, 2010

320161805 4ac230895c m Change Management in Schools

Why is Change Management necessary in education?

We find ourselves in a time when the organisations and institutions in which we work are changing dramatically in terms of their structure, their strategies, their systems and, not least, their expectations of their staff. The rate of change and discovery often outpaces our individual ability to keep up with it. These statements I have paraphrased from the book ‘Making Sense of Change Management:  Change Management in Schools’ by Cameron and Green, as they seem to ring true in our schools, especially those involved in capital build projects such as BSF or PCP.

What is Change Management?

Change Management seems to cover a wide brief; you may come across it in business or commerce where a new system or way of working is being proposed or implemented, you may come across it in project management where a change or amendment is being considered within the project, and you may come across it in coaching or counselling where individuals or teams are being better prepared to cope a change and its effects.

For me, effective change management in schools should have elements from all three of these examples, with an emphasis upon the third example. I like to see the emphasis upon the third example, where individuals or teams are being better prepared for the change and its effects, because in schools we are principally concerned with the outcomes of our teaching and learning, for which we rely upon our staff and our learners.

CPD and Change Management

Sometimes we see Change Management combined with CPD or training and there is little doubt that elements of training are important in successful change management. Change Management, though, requires more than just one day’s INSET or time in staff meetings to be effective. Change Management needs to be planned, it needs to be ongoing and it needs to be geared to the levels of the individual or teams affected. It requires time and finance, two things we are often short of in schools especially with all the other ongoing demands on resources. Additionally, effective change management needs to be able to respond in ‘emergencies’ where an individual is having difficulty coping with new ideas, aproaches, systems or just the thought or prospect of their introduction or, indeed, where a particular new system is misfunctioning or having unforseen adverse effects.

Change Management and Financial Control

Effective change management may also have an effect upon finacial controls or budgetting. I daresay we can all think of a project, an initiative or piece of equipment which has been introduced at great expense but which has subsequently failed to live up to expectations or lain idle or rarely been used to its full potential. Such situations will often give rise to thoughts, or even accusations, of money and time having been wasted. My thinking here is that where a new project or initiative is combined with a process of change management, then the potential benefits of the project are more likely to be realised and there would be a lower likelihood of accusations of misspent money.

Let’s not go overboard here. I am not saying that we need a full blown Change management implementation every time a school acquires an additional piece of equipment, especially where that piece of equipment is just an augmentation of what already exists. However, where a complete new system or a new way of working is being considered, then I believe that change management should be implemented to ensure its effective introduction and subsequent use.

 Change Management in Schools

Possibly Related Posts:


Guilty as Charged

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Wordle: Who tweeted the most at #naace2010?

Guilty as charged!

Well it seems that I was one of the most prolific users of Twitter at the recent Naace conference. Perhaps I should shut up and listen more but, on the other hand, I do like to share with others what I am doing, learning or thinking. That may sound a bit pompous because I guess it assumes that other people are interested in what I have to say/tweet. Thanks to @advisorymatters for posting these.

Wordle: Tweets from Naace Strategic Conference 2010

Let’s hope we said something useful among all that lot.

If you use a screen-capture or other image representation of the Wordle on this page, you must attribute the image to http://www.wordle.net/. Images of Wordles are licensed .

 Guilty as Charged

Possibly Related Posts:


Taking the C out of ICT

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

4040954784 f3fb99475e m Taking the C out of ICT

The title of this post comes from a presentation made by David Anstead at the Naace Strategic Conference in March 2010. To summarise, David’s most contentious suggestion is that we should remove the C (communication) element of ICT. His reasoning for this is that research by Ofsted  has suggested that the ‘communication  and presentation’ element of the ICT curriculum is being over-emphasised in schools and that other elements of ‘data-logging’, ‘control technology’ and ‘using spreadsheets’, were being overlooked. My inference from his presentation was that if we removed the (C)ommunication aspects, we would have more time to devote to those other aspects.

My first reaction upon seeing the graphs that Ofsted produce to show that Communication and Presentation is being fully covered is to take a moment to congratulate schools, staff and pupils for this achievement. Ofsted’s initial response appears to be that we should look at the other aspects of ICT and remove the emphasis upon Communication and Presentation.

When I put this suggestion to teachers, that we should remove ‘communication and presentation’, they were surprised and horrified, saying things like ‘but that’s the best bit’. My own feeling is that if my learners were doing really well in a topic, would I want to stop doing that topic or would I want to stretch it further?  If my learners consistently did well, might it not be an indication  that I am not stretching them, not challenging them enough and not maintaining their interest? In which case, would it not be better to challenge them and stretch them further to regain interest and raise their achievements? Or should I just stop?

Something that has me worried about the findings that Ofsted present is that in their report it indicates that the over-emphasis upon Communication and Presentation is evident in schools where ICT provision is weak; “The Importance of ICT” page 13 para 23. So it appears that this is not quite a common occurrence or one that can be observed equally across all schools but one where the indicators are skewed by the findings in schools with weak ICT provision.

In the light of this paragraph, I’d venture to suggest that the course of approach might not be to remove the Communication and presentation aspect of the ICT curriculum but to seek to strengthen the provision of ICT within these weak schools.

David did support his argument at the conference with a quotation, apparent from a pupil, along the lines of ‘my brother did programming but all we get is PowerPoint’. I seriously doubt the validity of that quotation, had it read ‘father’ instead of ‘brother’ it might have been more accurate as I don’t think ‘programming’ has been taught on any large scale within school curricula for many years.

Nevertheless, I can’t help but feel there is something behind the message that David is giving us here. Pupils do seem to be bored with the ICT curriculum and with powerpoint presentations and probably do want something that engages and challenges them more. In my schooldays or my father’s schooldays, we were inspired to become train drivers or pilots, if I were at school today I guess I might be inspired to become a website designer, a computer games programmer or a designer of apps for mobile devices. Does our current ICT curriculum meet the needs of such aspirations?

I seem to detect a groundswell of opinion in favour of emphasising ICT as a separate subject, giving learners ‘computer skills’ and knowledge of how computers work. This would be distinguished from using technology as a tool to help teach across all subjects. Perhaps Ofsted’s argument is feeding into this viewpoint. However, if we remove the Communication and Presentation aspects, can we honestly say that what is left of the ICT curriculum will give learners the skills and knowledge they seek?

I remain unconvinced that taking the C out of ICT is the right approach. If the over-emphasis upon communication is most marked in schools where ICT provision is weak, then surely the emphasis should be upon strengthening the ICT provision in those schools. If it remains that Communication and Presentation is well taught in schools, then let’s praise that fact and seek to build upon  it by stretching and challenging our learners further and raising their achievements. There is much about communication that is not taught in our schools, such as utilising web2.0 tools, web3.0 and other emerging technologies. Above all, there is more to presentation than PowerPoint. Equally, if we are to give our learners tools they need for the 21st Century then we need to re-examine our ICT curriculum and the ICT skills we teach and require of our learners, simply taking parts out cannot be the answer.

The Importance of ICT. Ofsted report

 Taking the C out of ICT

Possibly Related Posts: