Image 01

doug woods

ICT in Education Consultant and Trainer

Archive for the ‘web 2.0’ Category

Cheating and Collaboration

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Students taking a test at the University of Vi...
Image via Wikipedia

The other day, I took part in the #ukedchat discussion on  Twitter. A couple of days later I was quite flattered to read that one of my tweets in that discussion had been awarded tweet of the week (I didn’t know there was such and award). The tweet that was nominated went along the lines of …

The first thing we need to get across is that collaboration is not the same as cheating

What I’d like to do in this short post is to explain what I meant and why I tweeted it.

Those of us educated in the 50s, 60s, and on toward the turn of the century will be familiar with the notion that trying to copy what someone else has written in an exam and then passing that off as your own work, is cheating. Quite rightly so. Two, or more, people in an exam exchanging their answers with each other is also cheating. Neither of these scenarios, however, describe collaboration.

Collaboration in learning is not new; many of us will have worked with others in school on projects, topics or even in team sports. A fairly recent innovation, though,  is the ability to use education technology to support collaboration. Whereas, previously, a computer or software might have been used by a single person at a time, it is now possible for several people to be using a program or a service at the same time and to share their work with each other. We are not talking about one person telling another person the answer; we are talking about people sharing insights, sharing findings, sharing experiences and working together toward finding an answer, and not necessarily the same answer.

In the eyes of some teachers, some assessors and certainly some examination bodies, this is akin to cheating. They are wrong, it is not cheating; it is people working together to help find answers, solve problems and develop team or inter-personal skills.

Moreover, the collaboration that can be facilitated via educational technology is not restricted to in class or even in school use. Technology enables learners to work with learners in other institutions across the world. This enables cross-cultural or multi-cultural solutions to be explored. There may, however, be some institutions and some professionals who feel threatened by this. Even if they may have set the original task or question for the learner, it is as if they, the institution or professional, are no longer in charge of the learning that takes place and are unable to predict the outcomes.

So the use of collaborative technology might be regarded as an affront on traditional teaching methods, and consequently viewed with suspicion and labelled as ‘cheating’. But, surely not? Haven’t good teachers always encouraged elements of working together in ways I mentioned before? Of course they have, it is just that times have changed and approaches to education have changed but, maybe, some of these changes have yet to be widely accepted. Which is why I say that we still need to get across the point that collaboration is not cheating.

 Cheating and Collaboration

Possibly Related Posts:


Blogging in School

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

Think Messy.It appears that the subject of blogging in education is continuing to be a topic of discussion on Becta’s Research Network. A number of people are coming up with good ideas and there are some people who believe that it still has no place in education. Equally, there a re people who appear to express a ‘voice of reason’ by asking why should we adopt new technologies or new practices just because they are there, rather than because they have proven educational value.

I have always said that the power of blogging lies not in the blog but in the comments.

Hackers and spammers have long realised this, why do you think comment spam is so pervasive?

The educational potential of blogging in schools lies, it seems to me, not so much in the facility of the pupil to write their blog but in the facility it gives for other pupils and/or staff to add comments to that blog.

By blogging, the pupil is making digital notes of their learning and these, like written notes, can be of great value in aiding learning and recall, especially at examination or test times.

It is the facility to share the blog and to allow others to add comments that better befits the learning process. To illustrate what I mean, let us say that a pupil has written in their blog that they are doing an economic study of a particular country. Another pupil can then read this blog entry and add the comment that they, too, are doing a study of that same country and asks whether they can share their findings and co-operate together. Another pupil reads the blog entry and adds the comment that they have found a website which may be of relevant to the first pupil’s study and he adds a hyperlink. A third person reads the blog and adds the comment that he actually lives and works in the country concerned and asks whether his experiences might be of interest to the pupils.

So you can see that the comment facility in the blog has given the pupil a study buddy, a link to relevant information from another website and a possible first hand account.

Let us take the case further and let us now suppose that each of the three participants now add further parts to the blog, either by adding original items or by adding further comments. The blog then starts to take more shape and can be used to view how findings or answers were obtained. Let us suppose that one of the findings reported in the blog is inaccurate. A teacher can read through the blog and spot the inaccuracy, they can then add a comment and ask the pupil to recheck their finding.

It may also be the case that a pupil may be following a rather narrow line of enquiry in their study, the teacher has the facility to add comment(s) to try to steer the pupil into broadening their study into different aspects.

In order for all of this to take place, I am making a number of assumptions. Firstly, I am assuming that the facility to add comments is enabled, secondly, I am assuming that the ability to add comments is open to all and, thirdly, I am assuming that only the pupil has the ability to add original posts to the blog. This is actually the most common setup for a blog.

It is usually possible to disable commenting, though this does rather defeat any idea of co-operation. However, some form of restriction may be necessary to prevent abuse such as comment spam. It is possible for the pupil or staff member to have moderation rights, which means that they can decide which comments are published or not. Even without moderation rights, it is often possible to avoid comment spam by adding the requirement for the commenter to reply to challenge questions such as typing in a randomly chosen sequence of letters. This avoids much comment spam as that is often generated by automated bots.

It is always possible to allow the blog to be read and commented upon by anyone who comes across it on the blogosphere. This obviously allows for the widest amount of interaction and participation. However, it may be necessary to restruct access to only certain pupils or members of a particular school.

While it is usual for only the blog owner to have the facility to post original posts to their blog, it is often possible for the owner to allow posting rights to other people if they wish. It could be very beneficial if the teacher or tutor also has the right to post to pupil(s) blogs. With the teacher also having the right to post to blogs, then they can post new questions or new assignments, homework etc. for the pupil(s).

Well, for now, that is my view about blogging in schools. I do believe it has a value if it can be implemented succesfully. My enthusiasm for blogging is based upon its potential educational benefits rather than its technological availability or its current vogue.

If anyone would care to comment upon their views or experiences with blogging in schools, then please leave a comment ….. not comment spam please! LOL.

Possibly Related Posts:


Web Apps for Education (in a Time of Financial Constraint)

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Person with PDA handheld device.
Image via Wikipedia

Web Apps for Education (in a Time of Financial Constraint)

There always has, or should have, been a desire among schools to get value for money from their ICT purchases. I guess this is even more important nowadays in a climate of financial constraint. There has always been the desire though to balance financial commitment with getting the best for the learners. The best has not always proven to be the most expensive, or perhaps I should say that the most expensive services on offer have not always been the best.

We work in the world of education and I’m sure we would all appreciate suppliers offering their products and services, recognising this. Schools are not generally industries or services that utilise software and hardware to make money or to enable them to run more efficiently. Schools use software and ICT services to enable learning to take place. Whilst we do not object to people and companies making money, if they are offering their products within the education market, I think it only reasonable that we expect them to offer them in the spirit of education and not simply for the purpose of making a quick buck.

Recent years have witnessed the increase in services and products offered via the web. Not all of these have been aimed at schools but many are certainly useful for schools to use. Many of these products are free or have a free service, often with restrictions. Schools have certainly been looking at these and many are making use of them; that is where they are not blocked by overzealous filtering.

Where increasing bandwidth and download speeds are available, these web applications are proving very useful. Though, where connectivity remains poor the use of web tools can be problematic especially for large files such as video or music.

One major problem with web based applications has been that you cannot always rely upon them remaining available. There have been numerous instances of useful applications appearing but later being withdrawn and, more commonly, of applications starting out as ‘free’ but later becoming a paid-for or subscription service. An application may be withdrawn if development funding is insufficient, if development work proves too difficult or if it fails to attract sufficient users. In some cases, a company developing and offering a free service might be bought up by another company, which no longer wishes to offer the free service. Even where a service develops from a free one to a paid one, there is often, though not always, a basic free service which users may be able to continue using.

Users of free web-based services should always be aware of the possibility of the service changing in its nature and should ensure that critical work is not vulnerable to loss or future charges. Of course, there is always the possibility that the usefulness of the free service is clearly demonstrated to the school and that you may wish to take full advantage of the service by moving to the paid for service at a later date. In this way, the web based services might be seen as a form of ‘shareware’ in which you are allowed a free trial before parting with any money. In this way, web based apps may have an economic advantage for schools compared to commercial software packages.

Another aspect of web based applications is that they are usually available to users from any location. Pupils can use the application in school and continue their work at home. This is useful for a teacher setting course work in that they know the pupils each have equality of access to the same tools, provided they have a computer and connectivity at home. Web based applications are usually device independent, some will also work on handheld devices, so a teacher need not be concerned if a pupil has a Mac or even a Linux device at home or school rather than a PC.

Not only is location independence significant for work between school and home, it can also be significant globally in that pupils from across the world can work on the same web based application. This can lead to work being shared with other users around the world and be used to support collaborative projects across cultures and time barriers.

This collaborative aspect is an important one for it demonstrates that even in times of financial constraint, we are still able to extend education across new boundaries by using educational technology.

 Web Apps for Education (in a Time of Financial Constraint)

Possibly Related Posts: