Image 01

Posts Tagged ‘Learning styles’

Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Teacher helping student Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
Image via Wikipedia

In a previous post I mentioned the opportunity I had to observe a group of teachers doing team planning. As well as the observations I noted in that post, there was a further observation that I want to talk about in this post. It appeared to me that most of the teachers taking part in the team planning exercise were essentially still creating what I’d regard as an old style lesson plan. That is to say, it was to be a lesson that was to be delivered by the teacher and the planning focused more on what the teacher was going to do or what the teacher was going to get the pupils to do and what resources would be needed. The lesson, while not always a straightforward ‘sage on the stage’ approach, was certainly one that emphasised teacher direction or teacher facilitation, focused more on the teaching rather than the learning or the learner.

This type of planning was very familiar and would have been easily recognisable to a teacher 10, 20, even 30 years ago, it was only the resources available which were different; the approaches were much the same. This led me to wonder how might we change lesson planning to be more reflective of modern learning approaches?

It seems to me that the plan could be less about the structure of the lesson and more about the learning. I know they are called ‘lesson’ plans and in the past they have tended to describe the content of the lesson. Nowadays, though learning doesn’t just take place in the lesson; it can extend into the home and via out of school activities. There are also a wide range of informal learning opportunities which a learner can bring to contribute to their learning. So there is no need now for our planning to be restricted to a traditional lesson structure.

I know some people will argue, quite correctly, that we have always given homework to learners, where appropriate, to supplement their learning in school. However, the concept of ‘homework’ is quite dated now. It would be wrong, perhaps, to continue to think in terms of schoolwork and homework. It would be better to think simply in terms of ‘learning’ and what formal learning that takes place at home is an integral part of the ‘school’ work that takes place also in school.

So instead of presenting the learners with schoolwork in a lesson and then giving them homework to be done afterwards at home, a teacher would present learners with, say, an area or topic for study. A lesson or a series of lessons would be made available for the learners to study this in school, supported by the teacher, a range of resources and the face to face guidance of the teacher. In addition to these school sessions, a learner would be required to continue or extend their studies outside lessons, bringing in any experiences, resources available to them together with outcomes from any informal learning they may feel is relevant.

So Learning Plans would contain more than just plans for a lesson, they would seek to set out a number and range of ways in which learners could explore a subject area. Each of these ways would be designed to ensure the learner encounters particular objectives. Each of the ways could incorporate a different learning style, so as to appeal to different learners. There could even be discussion between teacher and learner as to what particular types of activities they would like the chance to explore.

In a way, I guess you could see a learning plan a bit like a treasure map but with different routes to the treasure, or maybe even several different treasure locations.

 Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • delicious Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • friendfeed Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • rss Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • stumbleupon Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • twitter Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • yahoobuzz Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • diigo Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • email link Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • googlebookmark Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • linkedin Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • pdf Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • ping Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • techmeme Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • tumblr Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • addtofavorites Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • digg Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • facebook Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • live Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • posterous Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?
  • technorati Lesson Plans or Learning Plans?

Possibly Related Posts:


Do Learning Styles Really Exist?

Monday, January 16th, 2012

150x943 Do Learning Styles Really Exist?

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Do learning styles exist? Let me answer that by saying, most definitely ‘yes’. In saying that, though, I do realise that I appear to be swimming against the tide of opinion. Over the last few years, it seems, more academics have been coming out to try to dismiss the notion of ‘learning styles’. However, when I read or listen to their arguments, it more often appears that their arguments are not against ‘learning styles’ but against one particular theory of learning styles and how it can be used, or misused, in education.

In some way, I guess the study of learning styles is a bit like the study of the universe. It is clear that we do not yet understand the universe fully and we have many different theories to try to explain it. Just because we don’t like one theory, we cannot dismiss the universe. The same is true of learning styles; just because existing theories may be wrong does not mean that learning styles do not exist.

The problem seems to be that when people talk or think about ‘learning styles’, they are refering to one theory; the VAK theory which categorises learning styles according to a person’s dominant sensory mode (Visual, Auditory or Kinaesthetic). This, however, is not the only theory of learning styles nor the original. It is probably, the most well known, however, because it is simple and easy to apply. Being simple and easy, of course, does not mean it is correct.

Now let’s consider a question. As a teacher, do you believe that all and each of your pupils learn in the same way, at the same time, at the same speed and have the same ability to retain, recall and apply their learning? Okay, that’s a rhetorical question, only a few inexperienced teachers would answer ‘yes’ to that, yet, by rejecting ‘learning styles’, that is what teachers are being asked to believe.

So in some ways, rejecting the idea of ‘learning styles’ might be seen as a regressive step for it would mean that teachers need not be concerned about differentiation, about providing a range of resources or adopting a variety of teaching approaches. Teaching could be reduced to its lowest level, take no heed of differing learner needs and any learner who fails to learn or keep up could simply be considered ‘thick’, inattentive or both. I know that sounds a bit extreme but this actually reflects a viewpoint I have heard from some opponents of learning styles.

So I think we can accept that people do not all learn the same way and that rejecting ‘learning styles’ wholesale would lead to a regressive approach to education that few would desire. On the other hand, the VAK model of learning style categorizes learners into very broad categories and very easily leads to learners being ‘labelled’ according to their supposed ‘style’, V A or K. It is this ‘labelling’ of learners that I find objectionable, experience as a teacher has shown me that broad labelling of pupils is almost always wrong and often objectionable.

For me, learning styles is not about labelling, it is about understanding. It is about understanding how, maybe why, learners learn. As a teacher, by understanding how learners in my classes learn, I am better able to select or create learning resources and experiences for them. I am also able to avoid teaching approaches that are not likely to produce effective learning for the learners.

It is my belief that learning styles are far more complex than any simple model can explain and that each person has their own preferred styles. Moreover, it is likely that one’s learning style changes and develops with time and experience. As an educationalist, what I believe we need is not another theory of learning styles but a tool that records how each pupil learns best.

 Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • delicious Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • friendfeed Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • rss Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • stumbleupon Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • twitter Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • yahoobuzz Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • diigo Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • email link Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • googlebookmark Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • linkedin Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • pdf Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • ping Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • techmeme Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • tumblr Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • addtofavorites Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • digg Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • facebook Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • live Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • posterous Do Learning Styles Really Exist?
  • technorati Do Learning Styles Really Exist?

Possibly Related Posts:


23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard

Monday, November 14th, 2011

3509154129 f486daa9fe m 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard

In a recent study, researchers found that in 23% of cases, learners achieved better results when interactive whiteborads (IWB) were NOT used.

Okay, this was not the main finding of the study but it is an interesting one and one which I feel some people will latch upon. We need, however, to look at why the research found this finding. On examining the evidence, the researchers discovered that there were potential pitfalls in using interactive whiteboards, these included;

1. Not organising  the content appropriately and/or presenting the content poorly – often the content was rushed through without allowing learners the time to interact or analyze the content.

2. Using too many visuals. Pages may be awash with imagery that it became difficult for the learner to identify the key content.

3. Inappropriate use of voting or feedback devices. These were often used to note how many students got the right answer without probing why wrong answers were given or explaining why one answer was more approriate than another.

So at first it migh be argued that this research suggests that inappropriate or poor use of the technology could be more damaging to learning than no use of technology. Even if the points above were corrected, however, I’d suggest that there would still be some learners who would learn better without the use of IWBs. The Interactive Whiteboard is essentially a visual medium or multimedia tool. There are some learners for whom a visual method is not the best method of presentation. I’m thinking here of those learners who may have a predominantly auditory or kinaesthetic learning style.

For learners with a preferred style of learning that is not visual, the use of interative whiteboards (or any predominantly visual tool) could be a distraction, a source of confusion or, at worst, a detriment to their learning.

I’d also suggest that there may be many learners who, though unrecognised or undiagnosed, are at some point along the Autistic spectrum. We know that autistic learners have difficulty combining senses and appear to learn better via one sense. Often this IS the visual sense but not necessarily so. For such a learner, a multi-sensory or multimodal approach could be confusing or detrimental.

So, the research suggests that at least a fifth of learners learn better without an interactive whiteboard being used. Their suggestion is that it is inappropriate use of the technology which underlies this. Correcting the inappropriate usage may reduce this figure. However, there may still be those learners for whom the IWB may not be the best technology to utilise because of their preferred learning style.

The research was carried out by Robert Marzano and reported in the paper Multiple Measures; Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards published November 2009.  An extract of which can be found here on the ASCD website. The study appears to have involved Promethean boards but should also be relevant to other manufacturers’ products.

  • delicious 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • friendfeed 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • rss 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • stumbleupon 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • twitter 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • yahoobuzz 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • diigo 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • email link 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • googlebookmark 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • linkedin 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • pdf 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • ping 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • techmeme 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • tumblr 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • addtofavorites 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • digg 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • facebook 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • live 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • posterous 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard
  • technorati 23% of Learners Learn Better Without an Interactive Whiteboard

Possibly Related Posts:


Transforming Learning

Monday, September 26th, 2011

I have just posted an introduction to a new project on Learning Transformation. You can view it here on the main website. This is just the introduction, further posts will follow in due course.

This project is part of my work as an education consultant and will lead to presentations on the subject of transforming learning. I hope also to include some of my work on Personal learning networks and home access, maybe including some of my earlier work on learning styles. The ICT aspect, so much at the heart of my work, will be seen as a vehicle for delivering the transformation of learning.

  • delicious Transforming Learning
  • friendfeed Transforming Learning
  • rss Transforming Learning
  • stumbleupon Transforming Learning
  • twitter Transforming Learning
  • yahoobuzz Transforming Learning
  • diigo Transforming Learning
  • email link Transforming Learning
  • googlebookmark Transforming Learning
  • linkedin Transforming Learning
  • pdf Transforming Learning
  • ping Transforming Learning
  • techmeme Transforming Learning
  • tumblr Transforming Learning
  • addtofavorites Transforming Learning
  • digg Transforming Learning
  • facebook Transforming Learning
  • live Transforming Learning
  • posterous Transforming Learning
  • technorati Transforming Learning

Possibly Related Posts: